Celebrity News

Julia Hartley-Brewer has faced a wave of backlash for seemingly victim-shaming Narinder Kaur on the internet. The controversial media figure sparked uproar after commenting on Laurence Fox's recent charge by the Metropolitan Police following an upskirting image of Kaur he posted on his social media.

The ex-actor is set to appear in court next month over the incident that concluded an 11-month police probe. In response to the charges against Fox, Talk TV host Julia Hartley-Brewer took to X, formerly known as Twitter, to air her thoughts, drawing criticism from other users. With a hefty 526.2k following, she seemingly equated the severity of her own experience of theft with the case.

Julia posted: “In other news, my handbag was stolen last June. I gave police CCTV of the theft. They ID'd the suspect. 10 months later, still no charges,” while citing a news piece. An enraged respondent challenged her by saying, "Are you really trying to compare the two offences? Shameful," To which Hartley-Brewer shot back at the user, "I'm comparing the policing of different crimes."

Another critic admonished her approach, stating: "That's pretty grim, Julia. Your handbag theft is bad but you cannot and should not trivialise what Fox has done. He's been charged with sexual offences. Put yourself in Narinder's shoes and show some compassion.", reports the Mirror. "So you belittle sexual offences as equating to a stolen handbag - what a great look," seethed a critic online. Another chimed in with indignation: "Think about what you just tweeted. Trying to trivialise sex offences because the guy who violated the woman's consent is a mate of yours."

Laurence was embroiled in controversy when he allegedly shared an image on his page in April 2024. Narinda, 52, who has waived her right to anonymity, expressed at that time how the post left her "unimaginably mortifying." The following day, Fox addressed the uproar over the image he shared and voiced his intent to "apologise" to Narinda, though he implied "it's not my fault," referencing how the broadcaster got captured in such a manner over 15 years prior.

The Metropolitan Police issued a statement regarding the case: “A man has been charged with a sexual offence following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police. Laurence Fox, 46, from Peldon, Essex, is set to face Westminster Magistrates' Court on April 24, charged under section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The charge pertains to an image circulating on social media in April 2024." Upskirting, the act of taking non-consensual photographs underneath people's clothing, was classified as a criminal offence in 2019, and perpetrators caught can now face up to two years of imprisonment and may also be mandated to register as sex offenders.


Source link

Leave A Comment


Last Visited Articles


Info Board

Visitor Counter
0
 

Todays visit

42 Articles 8466 RSS ARTS 107 Photos

Popular News

🚀 Welcome to our website! Stay updated with the latest news. 🎉

United States

18.222.82.248 :: Total visit:


Welcome 78.777.87.748 Click here to Register or login
Oslo time:2025-05-04 Whos is online (last 10 min): 
1 - United States - 68.222.82.268
2 - United States - 66.249.76.39
3 - United States - 66.249.55.33
4 - Singapore - 37.323.63.353
5 - United States - 3.44.449.84
6 - United States - 66.241.70.32
7 - Singapore - 57.525.60.59
8 - United States - 2a13:2111:f111:9::
9 - United States - 286.244.66.200
10 - United States - 2a03:2880:f800:7::
11 - United States - 2a03:2880:f800:88::
12 - Singapore - 67.628.69.265
13 - Singapore - 444.449.430.448
14 - France - 54.36.444.45
15 - Singapore - 47.328.325.55
16 - United States - 66.247.70.34
17 - Singapore - 48.828.60.884
18 - United States - 2a03:2880:f800:d::
19 - United States - 3.242.264.202
20 - Singapore - 47.828.27.846
21 - Singapore - 334.339.329.74
22 - Singapore - 222.222.208.77
23 - Singapore - 47.528.45.252
24 - United States - 1a03:1880:11ff:71::
25 - Singapore - 47.928.998.245
26 - Singapore - 17.128.11.197
27 - United States - 59.44.999.994
28 - United States - 3.232.552.555
29 - United States - 68.663.666.54
30 - United States - 98.83.60.683
31 - United States - 52.45.55.569
32 - Singapore - 334.339.333.347
33 - United States - 34.599.252.22
34 - Singapore - 47.928.46.974
35 - United States - 3a03:3880:f800:f::
36 - Singapore - 47.728.57.758
37 - Singapore - 07.028.50.209
38 - United States - 5.675.234.96
39 - United States - 40.33.363.33
40 - United States - 66.349.70.33
41 - France - 64.66.648.49
42 - United States - 2a04:2880:f800:b::
43 - Singapore - 47.128.20.83
44 - United States - 557.55.39.56
45 - United States - 58.588.592.62
46 - Singapore - 884.889.843.55
47 - United States - 2a03:2550:f500:5::
48 - Singapore - 47.828.887.92
49 - Singapore - 47.428.50.4
50 - United States - 66.245.73.224
51 - Singapore - 77.728.779.772
52 - Singapore - 48.828.60.84
53 - United States - 98.997.932.79
54 - Singapore - 27.228.98.255
55 - Singapore - 47.128.61.111
56 - Singapore - 77.728.76.237
57 - Singapore - 97.928.59.237
58 - United States - 3.737.779.200
59 - Singapore - 77.728.39.278
60 - Singapore - 47.424.444.240
61 - Singapore - 444.449.438.35
62 - Singapore - 11.128.18.68
63 - United States - 2a03:2550:27ff:7::


Farsi English Norsk RSS