Top Stories

Big drop in plays staged by theatres over past decade

Ian Youngs
Culture reporter
Getty Images A performer on stage dressed in a black top and grey trousers. A spotlight can be seen at the side of the stage.Getty Images

The number of plays and musicals staged by the UK's main subsidised theatres last year was down by almost a third compared with 10 years earlier, BBC research suggests.

In 2024, the 40 best-funded theatre companies that make their own productions - ranging from the National Theatre to the Colchester Mercury - opened 229 original productions, compared with 332 in 2014, a drop of 31%.

Funding cuts and rising costs took much of the blame, with National Theatre executive director Kate Varah recently saying many in the industry are at "breaking point".

But some venues said the shows they do stage are on a bigger scale than a decade ago, with the aim of running for longer on tour or in the West End.

PA Media Lesley Manville holding her Olivier AwardPA Media

Last week, actress Lesley Manville warned that new talent had "less opportunity" to develop than when she was starting out in the 1970s.

"It's going to be a diminishing discipline, because there's not always the amount of stage work available for them to go and do," she told BBC Radio 4 after winning an Olivier Award.

'Serious problem'

Leeds Playhouse chief executive and artistic director James Brining said the venue had cut its number of homegrown shows from 12 to eight a year.

"That decision to contract has been forced upon theatres because it's so expensive, and increasingly so, to make work," he told BBC News.

"We love making work. So it's heartbreaking that the amount of work you can make is reducing, and it is reducing the pipeline opportunities for artists at the beginning of their careers."

British theatre has "a serious problem" with the reduction in opportunities, added Brining, who is about to move from Leeds Playhouse to run the Edinburgh Lyceum.

Many performers and crew start their careers in theatres before going on to work in TV and film, arts education consultant and theatre blogger Carl Woodward said.

"A lot of Netflix stars and a lot of those people we see on dramas like Mr Bates vs the Post office and Adolescence cut their teeth in regional theatres.

"And if those opportunities are no longer there, then those pathways don't exist. And that is a national scandal, I think."

The theatre industry's financial pressures have had an impact on the workforce, with "chronic low pay, job insecurity, poor work/life balance," he added.

Moviestore/Shutterstock Emma Rydal and Jimi Mistry embracing in a scene from 1999 film East Is EastMoviestore/Shutterstock

Many venues said they now co-produce more shows with other theatres or commercial operators to spread the costs and risks. That also means those productions can be on a bigger scale.

"Some individual productions that are made with the commercial sector are much, much bigger than anything we ever used to make," Birmingham Rep chief executive Rachael Thomas said.

"So for us, yes there are fewer productions coming out, but we are spending more because the productions that we are making are so much bigger than they ever used to be."

However, the Rep has lost all of its annual local council funding - once worth more than £1m a year - and smaller shows have often been squeezed out, Thomas said.

"I suppose the subsidy enables you to take the risk on the productions that are never going to recoup what they've cost, and often that will be the smaller-scale productions."

In 1995, the Rep's studio theatre staged the premiere of East Is East, four years before it became a hit British film. It couldn't afford to do a play of that scale in its studio today.

"I cannot see a world in which we could now launch a play which has got a cast size of nine or 10 in our 133-seater studio space now as a new play," Thomas said.

"For our model, and I would say for the vast majority of regional producing theatres, that is nigh on impossible."

'Less serious drama'

Salisbury Playhouse artistic director Gareth Machin said audience tastes had also changed, meaning it's harder to put on "serious drama", especially outside London.

"When money is tight, people want a good night out and they don't want to take a risk," he said.

"They're probably not coming out as much as they were, so when they do come out they don't want to take a chance on something they're not sure is going to be entertaining and a fun experience.

"So there's less misery and risk."

Nottingham Playhouse chief executive and UK Theatre joint president Stephanie Sirr said she didn't recognise the picture of a drop in productions, pointing out that "it does fluctuate from year to year".

"I do think it's more difficult to produce these days," she continued.

"The costs have gone up exponentially. Things like the energy costs really impact you if you're building scenery all day, or if you're running theatre lanterns all night."

However, making more co-productions is a positive thing in most ways, and has meant "we've been able to really increase the scale of the work we produce", she said, with Nottingham's production of Dear Evan Hansen now on a major UK tour.

'More with less'

A handful of venues staged more original shows in 2024 than 2014. They include Leicester Curve, which has put a focus on making musicals in collaboration with commercial producers, which can then go on the road.

Curve has doubled its box office receipts over the past decade.

"By sharing resources and risk, we're able to, by default, do more work and create and present more work," chief executive Chris Stafford said.

"We are doing more with less in terms of public investment," he continued, but said the biggest challenge for many theatres would be affording essential building repairs and upgrades in the coming years.

Annual funding from Arts Councils in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and the Scottish equivalent has largely been stagnant for the past 10 years - while inflation has risen sharply - and many venues have had their local council subsidies cut. Many are also still recovering from the fallout from the pandemic.

Last year, a survey by the group Freelancers Make Theatre Work depicted "a workforce that is at breaking point".

Performer and group spokesman Paul Carey Jones said the BBC research "would come as no surprise to most theatre freelancers in the UK, who have been struggling with low rates of pay, career precarity and vulnerability, a lack of job certainty and a skills retention crisis for many years now.

"It shows the need for action from government in terms of funding for the arts, but also from the theatre industry to support its freelance workforce, on which it entirely depends."

The research for this story counted original and co-productions that opened in 2014 and 2024, including revivals, transfers and tours. They had to be professional in-person theatre productions, at least an hour long, and to have run for at least a week. If a co-production was jointly made by more than one theatre, it was counted as a single production.

The research covered the 40 venues, festivals and touring companies that produce original theatre, were operating in 2014 and 2024, and had the highest annual grants in 2024/25 from the Arts Councils of England, Wales and Northern Ireland, Creative Scotland and the Scottish government.


Source link

Leave A Comment


Last Visited Articles


Info Board

Visitor Counter
0
 

Todays visit

42 Articles 8499 RSS ARTS 107 Photos

Popular News

🚀 Welcome to our website! Stay updated with the latest news. 🎉

United States

3.139.86.227 :: Total visit:


Welcome 3.739.86.777 Click here to Register or login
Oslo time:2025-05-05 Whos is online (last 10 min): 
1 - United States - 1.119.86.227
2 - United States - 66.249.70.44
3 - United States - 66.259.70.52
4 - United States - 52.233.53.399
5 - United States - 384.73.335.38
6 - Singapore - 49.928.999.3
7 - United States - 084.70.05.082
8 - United States - 4.448.447.25
9 - United States - 48.209.434.234
10 - United States - 52.0.238.239
11 - United States - 98.204.89.56
12 - United States - 34.894.95.99
13 - Singapore - 47.428.22.444
14 - United States - 52.25.29.57
15 - Singapore - 884.889.838.35
16 - United States - 52.3.655.666
17 - United States - 44.666.636.50
18 - United States - 22.222.242.239
19 - United States - 2a03:2880:f800:60::
20 - United States - 44.607.69.606
21 - United States - 3.258.503.254
22 - Singapore - 47.928.48.249
23 - United States - 3.644.256.83
24 - United States - 52.204.88.848
25 - United States - 900.29.909.38
26 - United States - 3.220.748.777
27 - United States - 3.205.220.025
28 - United States - 22.207.29.232
29 - Singapore - 47.525.24.235
30 - United States - 3.90.73.206
31 - United States - 52.203.237.070
32 - United States - 900.28.998.96
33 - United States - 23.26.666.232
34 - United States - 54.647.60.637
35 - United States - 66.249.70.34
36 - United States - 3.222.246.293
37 - Singapore - 47.928.29.74
38 - United States - 54.204.32.335
39 - United States - 66.249.64.628
40 - United States - 34.231.118.144
41 - United States - 6.648.606.74
42 - Singapore - 664.666.636.647
43 - United States - 44.994.934.53
44 - United States - 52.22.64.202
45 - Singapore - 47.128.118.14
46 - United States - 50.0.038.8
47 - United States - 3.232.39.97
48 - United States - 54.34.343.39
49 - United States - 33.237.255.367
50 - Singapore - 47.888.84.38
51 - United States - 58.255.95.555
52 - United States - 66.248.70.38
53 - United States - 2a03:2880:88ff:73::
54 - United States - 23.23.223.282
55 - United States - 34.470.204.440
56 - United States - 407.20.484.448
57 - Singapore - 47.020.55.59
58 - United States - 38.235.33.39
59 - United States - 37.772.727.772
60 - United States - 2a03:2880:f800:86::
61 - United States - 58.255.502.586
62 - United States - 54.547.235.59
63 - Singapore - 47.528.55.59
64 - United States - 54.005.080.060
65 - Singapore - 333.339.333.363
66 - United States - 50.00.248.00
67 - United States - 23.23.55.55
68 - United States - 7.744.25.227
69 - United States - 52.22.87.224
70 - United States - 9.997.979.906
71 - Singapore - 47.228.45.222
72 - United States - 2a03:2880:f800:74::
73 - Singapore - 47.338.333.386
74 - United States - 3.273.46.222
75 - Singapore - 47.528.28.237
76 - United States - 3.295.59.93
77 - United States - 52.3.323.330
78 - United States - 3.94.887.28
79 - United States - 54.84.569.596
80 - United States - 246.244.66.237
81 - United States - 3.255.55.66
82 - United States - 34.634.600.607
83 - Singapore - 47.528.555.552
84 - United States - 6.266.606.226
85 - United States - 14.204.110.196
86 - United States - 18.188.117.79
87 - United States - 3.257.82.254
88 - United States - 52.25.292.265
89 - United States - 37.237.756.59
90 - Singapore - 47.118.113.131
91 - United States - 44.280.283.220
92 - United States - 48.245.243.234
93 - Singapore - 47.328.38.224
94 - United States - 34.234.45.44
95 - United States - 48.83.226.425
96 - United States - 3.111.119.113
97 - United States - 2a03:2880:f800:9::
98 - Singapore - 664.669.636.266
99 - Singapore - 47.628.620.40
100 - United States - 24.82.26.2
101 - United States - 52.72.223.226
102 - United States - 77.235.77.246
103 - United States - 57.777.782.97
104 - Singapore - 77.778.30.707
105 - United States - 12.3.116.186
106 - United States - 3.93.98.99
107 - United States - 44.205.74.494
108 - United States - 58.85.880.88
109 - Singapore - 47.128.25.10
110 - United States - 3.220.70.070
111 - Singapore - 97.928.93.290
112 - Singapore - 554.559.535.258
113 - Singapore - 44.428.24.52
114 - United States - 200.29.260.22
115 - United States - 700.29.755.79
116 - United States - 52.255.222.254
117 - United States - 3.216.227.216
118 - Singapore - 47.424.449.477
119 - United States - 18.217.118.153
120 - United States - 50.57.593.48
121 - Singapore - 43.328.35.323
122 - United States - 2a33:2883:f833:33::
123 - United States - 66.249.75.35
124 - United States - 52.567.544.595
125 - Singapore - 47.628.660.266
126 - Singapore - 47.728.49.227
127 - United States - 2a03:2880:f800:85::


Farsi English Norsk RSS