News Feed

A popular seaside county is pushing back against the introduction of the tourist tax as it aims to provide certainty across the industry. The Welsh government is set to introduce the visitor levy, but it will be up to individual councils to pursue it - Pembrokeshire council has announced it will not be introducing the tax. 

Finance minister Mark Drakeford announced two major changes on Wednesday, April 1. The first being that children will be exempt from the tax and also that the rates will be going up marginally to cover the cost. The levy is currently making its way through the Senedd process after passing its first vote. Pembrokeshire council has now announced it will not be placing the levy on tourists this term, according to cabinet member Paul Miller. The Welsh Government's finance minister also said he does not think any council could bring it in before 2027 due to the way in which the levy is being introduced. 

However, for any council wishing to implement the tax, it will have to carry out a public consultation with its residents. 

The Welsh government says the aims of the bill include ensuring a more even share of costs to fund local services and infrastructure that benefit visitors. Providing councils with the ability to generate money is another goal, which can then be invested back into local services and infrastructure to support tourism. Thirdly, the levy is expected to support the Welsh Government’s ambitions for sustainable tourism.

Cabinet member Paul Miller told WalesOnline: “We provide a fantastic tourism offer here in Pembrokeshire and it is an important part of the county’s economy. In addition to jobs, this administration’s approach is also about the year-round facilities and attractions that benefit local people too.

“We recognise the tourism landscape has experienced significant change, be that second homes legislation, tax changes and we’re aiming to provide some certainty to the industry. We acknowledge it's important to recognise there's a balance to be struck between supporting the industry and dealing with some of the challenges associated with peaks in season. 

“Therefore, I’m confirming it's not our intention to take forward the option of a visitor levy in Pembrokeshire during this administration."

Local MS Paul Davies welcomed the decision, saying that “Pembrokeshire County Council have made the right decision not to take forward a visitor levy”. Mr Davies explained how the industry has faced a challenging few years and that  “protecting the sustainability of the sector for years to come is key”. 


Source link

Leave A Comment


Last Visited Articles


Info Board

Visitor Counter
0
 

Todays visit

42 Articles 8507 RSS ARTS 107 Photos

Popular News

🚀 Welcome to our website! Stay updated with the latest news. 🎉

United States

3.138.191.28 :: Total visit:


Welcome 3.038.090.08 Click here to Register or login
Oslo time:2025-05-05 Whos is online (last 10 min): 
1 - United States - 3.538.595.58
2 - Singapore - 554.555.556.208
3 - Singapore - 47.228.226.28
4 - United States - 2a23:2882:27ff:6::
5 - United States - 68.268.66.678
6 - Singapore - 07.028.00.032
7 - Singapore - 47.228.27.242
8 - United States - 006.044.66.037
9 - Singapore - 47.928.54.933
10 - Singapore - 222.222.230.228
11 - United States - 66.849.78.33
12 - Singapore - 47.888.89.898
13 - United States - 66.249.70.32
14 - Singapore - 48.828.55.898
15 - France - 64.36.648.237
16 - Singapore - 47.338.43.398
17 - United States - 2a93:2889:f899:f::
18 - United States - 297.46.99.54
19 - Singapore - 07.028.33.206
20 - United States - 66.209.70.35
21 - United States - 3.337.68.89
22 - Singapore - 47.628.626.224
23 - Singapore - 47.668.46.36
24 - Singapore - 47.228.20.223
25 - Singapore - 664.669.636.35
26 - United States - 3.66.683.238
27 - Singapore - 27.228.57.203
28 - United States - 2a03:2440:f400::
29 - United States - 23.25.250.48
30 - Singapore - 57.525.57.550
31 - United States - 56.697.662.76
32 - United States - 34.399.252.22
33 - United States - 28.83.277.42
34 - United States - 52.3.552.55
35 - United States - 57.7.73.743
36 - United States - 23.24.479.424
37 - Singapore - 49.928.99.20
38 - United States - 54.262.32.223
39 - Singapore - 554.559.533.555
40 - United States - 3.200.223.60
41 - United States - 084.70.84.054
42 - Singapore - 47.728.55.772
43 - United States - 54.84.247.79
44 - United States - 23.23.222.222
45 - United States - 44.285.828.22
46 - United States - 32.292.225.239
47 - Singapore - 47.668.38.665
48 - United States - 34.223.222.25
49 - United States - 56.96.622.696
50 - Singapore - 47.558.55.535
51 - United States - 3.85.889.95
52 - United States - 52.55.256.596
53 - United States - 56.226.203.26
54 - Singapore - 47.828.827.875
55 - United States - 52.967.944.295
56 - United States - 8a08:8880:f800:b::
57 - Singapore - 47.028.008.240
58 - United States - 66.249.64.632
59 - Singapore - 47.428.44.44
60 - Singapore - 47.228.63.239
61 - United States - 2a63:2886:f866:6c::
62 - Singapore - 47.428.444.78
63 - United States - 66.249.10.34
64 - Singapore - 47.028.06.208
65 - United States - 66.649.70.39
66 - United States - 66.249.64.529
67 - Singapore - 47.828.35.288
68 - France - 54.36.248.233


Farsi English Norsk RSS